Device evaluated by mfr: visual inspection revealed the distal filter hypotube is bent, front handle shells are split open.The proximal filter attempted to be sheathed with handles separated; however the device failed functional testing as the proximal filter failed to deploy and resheath.Adhesive around proximal filter is loose causing brunching of filter material.The dhr review was performed on lot number 18h06h03.And shows that all acceptance records demonstrate that the device was manufactured in accordance with the device master record.The conclusion code is unintended use error caused or contributed to event.The ifu states "repositioning, if required, should only occur during initial placement and the proximal filter should be re-sheathed prior to re-positioning".The event description suggests the proximal filter was attempted to be sheathed with handles separated.
|
Reportable on analysis completed 03 january 2019.It was reported that failure to deploy the filter occurred.Vascular access was obtained via a radial artery approach.A sentinel embolic protection device was advanced.The sentinel device was prepared step by step as usual and no abnormality was noticed.When the device reached aorta and ready to deploy the proximal filter in bcc, the filter could not fully open, so dr lam tried to retrieve the filter back to catheter but failed.Consider patient safety dr lam decided to remove the whole system from patients body.They examine the device upon retrieved and found the handle was broken.Finally, doctor used a new piece of sentinel (same lot) to continue the case without any problem.The patient's status is stable.However, returned device analysis revealed loose filter adhesive.
|