• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MALEM MEDICAL LTD. MALEM BEDWETTING ALARM; ALARM, CONDITIONED RESPONSE ENURESIS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MALEM MEDICAL LTD. MALEM BEDWETTING ALARM; ALARM, CONDITIONED RESPONSE ENURESIS Back to Search Results
Device Problem Overheating of Device (1437)
Patient Problems Burn(s) (1757); Injury (2348)
Event Date 01/22/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Pt is a (b)(6) girl who was diagnosed with nocturnal enuresis.Dr prescribed an alarm for treatment.Pt used the alarm for 3 nights unsuccessfully.On the fourth night, pt had an incident with the alarm.The pt went to bed with the alarm set up, but woke up parents from loud cries.Mother heard cries and found that pt had received burns on skin near neck area from the alarm.The alarm has developed a defect which made it become hot.Pt's mother pulled out the alarm and in the process hurt her hands from the heat.The child was taken to a nearby clinic for treatment of burns and is recovering.The alarm has been returned to the mfr.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MALEM BEDWETTING ALARM
Type of Device
ALARM, CONDITIONED RESPONSE ENURESIS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MALEM MEDICAL LTD.
MDR Report Key8293034
MDR Text Key134610462
Report NumberMW5083560
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KPN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Voluntary
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/30/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/28/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received01/31/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No Information
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age4 YR
Patient Weight21
-
-