• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OPTONOL LTD. EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE; IMPLANT, EYE VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OPTONOL LTD. EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE; IMPLANT, EYE VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number P-50 PL
Device Problem No Flow (2991)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 01/10/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The sample has not been received; therefore, the condition of the product could not be verified and visual inspection could not be performed.The device history record (dhr) for the batch was reviewed.No abnormalities were found during the dhr review and the product was released according to release criteria.Since the sample has not been received, the complaint could not be confirmed, and the root cause could not be determined.There are no other complaints in the lot.Additional information was requested.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
During a glaucoma filtering shunt implant procedure, once the shunt was put into place in the eye, fluid did not flow through it.A clog was suspected, so the shunt was immediately removed and alternate glaucoma surgery was performed.Additional information was requested.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The sample has been received and investigated: the sample returned in an open secondary package and included: the delivery system (ds) in a cradle, the shunt in a separate plastic bag, and ifu.-the ds wire was fully pressed.The ds was pulled back and didn¿t protrude from the cannula opening.The shunt was covered with dirt and residues.The shunt lumen was blocked.After the cleaning the shunt lumen was open.After the cleaning the shunt was investigated: it had damages over its body surface.All products pass 100% final inspection prior to approval.If a defect would be noticed, the product would have been rejected.Having said that, one may conclude that the blockage was formed after the product left the manufacturing plant.The root cause is inconclusive - unable to verify, since the blockage could have been caused by many different reasons during the clinical procedure.However, the complaint on blockage is confirmed.The blockage does not seem to be product related since after cleaning the device - the blockage was removed.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE
Type of Device
IMPLANT, EYE VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OPTONOL LTD.
kiryat hatikshoret
communication center
neve-ilan 90850
IS  90850
MDR Report Key8310259
MDR Text Key135177921
Report Number3003701944-2019-00005
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KYF
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K012852
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/19/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/06/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2021
Device Model NumberP-50 PL
Device Catalogue Number24053
Device Lot Number073085
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/17/2019
Date Manufacturer Received09/19/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-