The dispatched service engineer could narrow down the root cause for the problem to a worn motor and replaced it.The device passed all tests after the repair exchange and is back in use w/o further problems.The manufacturer has evaluated the log file and found entries which are in relation to the reported ventilator failure: two different error codes can be found in the log; first one is indicating speed deviations and the second one a stalling of the motor, finally.The particular motor has been in operation for more than 12 years.This motor is designed for a lifetime of 10 years at standard operating conditions which the respective unit has lasted.Dräger finally concludes that the device responded as designed upon the malfunction of a wear-and-tear component; it has shut down automatic ventilation when the error occurred to prevent from damages to the ventilator unit and posted a corresponding alarm.Manual ventilation remains possible.Reportedly, no patient consequences have occurred.
|