(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.Visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The tip separation was confirmed.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot revealed no other incidents.The investigation determined that the tip separation was likely due to inadvertent mishandling.It is likely that the tip was inadvertently grasped during removal of the stylet causing the inner member and tip to separate.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture or labeling of the device.
|