• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SORIN GROUP ITALIA S.R.L. PERCEVAL SUTURELESS AORTIC VALVE; TISSUE HEART VALVES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SORIN GROUP ITALIA S.R.L. PERCEVAL SUTURELESS AORTIC VALVE; TISSUE HEART VALVES Back to Search Results
Model Number PVS21
Device Problem Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 01/03/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
A complete manufacturing and material records review for the device has been performed.The results confirmed that the device satisfied all material, visual and performance standards required at the time of manufacture and release.Since the device remains implanted in the patient, further investigation on the prosthesis cannot be performed.
 
Event Description
The manufacturer was informed on the event through the (b)(6) database: on (b)(6) 2014, an (b)(6) female patient received a perceval pvs21 to replace the native stenotic aortic valve.The procedure was performed in median sternotomy.A cabg was also performed during the same procedure.On the same day, the site reports a device dislodgment.As such, a reintervention occurred and the patient underwent an open surgical procedure without device explant.The patient was discharged on (b)(6) 2014, with a good device functionality (mean gradient was 14mmhg, and no central/perivalvular leaks were observed).The functionality of the prosthesis was monitored yearly since its implant, with the following findings: in (b)(6) 2015, the echo shows a mean gradient of 14mmhg, with no central/perivalvular leaks; in (b)(6) 2016, the echo reports a mean gradient of 10mmhg, with no central/perivalvular leaks; in (b)(6) 2017, the reported mean gradient was 12mmhg, and no central/perivalvular leaks were observed.Lastly, in (b)(6) 2018, the echo showed a mean gradient of 4mmhg, no perivalvular leak and a central leak of 1+ (traces).The site reports that the patient ultimately died (b)(6) 2018 due to non-cardiovascular mortality.Since no autopsy was performed, the device was not explanted (not valve-related).
 
Event Description
The manufacturer was informed on the event through the sure avr database.On (b)(6) 2014, an 84 years old female patient received a perceval pvs21 to replace the native stenotic aortic valve.The procedure was performed in median sternotomy.A cabg was also performed during the same procedure, prior to the aortic valve replacement.At the end of the procedure, during the routine intraoperative tee, a paraprosthetic leak was detected.The aortotomy was again performed and the valve was found dislodged in supra-annular position.It is reported that no cpr nor any other manipulation of the heart was performed after the perceval implant.Consequently, an open surgical procedure was performed but the device was not explanted (device repositioned).The site reports that the severe annulus calcification might have been the cause of the difficulties encountered at the implant.The patient was discharged on (b)(6) 2014, with a good device functionality (mean gradient was 14mmhg, and no central/perivalvular leaks were observed).A good valve functionality was also observed during the yearly follow up visits performed between 2015 and 2018: the mean gradient was 14mmhg, 10mmhg, 12mmhg, 4mmhg, respectively; no central/perivalvular leaks were detected in neither visit, except for the one in 2018 where a central leak 1+ was observed (as previously reported by the site, regurgitation 1+ is considered a mild regurgitation without hemodynamic consequences).The site reports that the patient died on 05 oct 2018 due to non-cardiovascular mortality (not valve-related).Since no autopsy was performed, the device was not explanted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Since the device was not explanted during the re-intervention and since a good device functionality was observed during the yearly follow-up visits, the device could be reasonably excluded as contributory factor of the event.As reported by the site, it is possible that the severe calcification of the patient's annulus may have contributed to the event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PERCEVAL SUTURELESS AORTIC VALVE
Type of Device
TISSUE HEART VALVES
Manufacturer (Section D)
SORIN GROUP ITALIA S.R.L.
strada crescentino snc
saluggia, vercelli
MDR Report Key8332956
MDR Text Key135942944
Report Number3005687633-2019-00130
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P150011
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,study
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/18/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/12/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/01/2016
Device Model NumberPVS21
Device Catalogue NumberICV1208
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/17/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age84 YR
Patient Weight53
-
-