The customer reported complaint for the platform stopped compressions was confirmed during archive data review but not during the functional testing.Visual inspection was performed and found no physical damage to the autopulse platform.The autopulse passed the initial functional test without any fault or error.Review of the archive data indicated error message user advisory (ua) 07 on the customer reported event date, thus confirming the reported complaint.The load cell characterization test confirmed the load cell module is defective and the replacement is required to address the reported issue.Upon customer approval, the components will be replaced and the device will be further tested to full specification.Historical complaints were reviewed for service information related to the reported complaint and there was no previous history of complaints for autopulse platform sn (b)(4).The death was not related to the autopulse device.The autopulse is used as an adjunct to manual cpr in cases of clinical death.The benefit of using the autopulse is that it in part substitutes mechanical compressions for the physical labor of manual chest compressions.If the autopulse did not start or unexpectedly stops compressions, rescuer should revert to manual cpr, which is the standard of care.In this case, when the autopulse platform (sn (b)(4)) was used on a cardiac arrest patient, it stopped after the first compression.Manual cpr was performed when the use of the autopulse platform was discontinued.A return of spontaneous circulation (rosc) was not achieved and the patient expired.The autopulse was intended to be used as an adjunct to manual cpr on adult patients.In case of stoppage of autopulse the user reverts to manual cpr.The transition from autopulse to manual cpr by trained users is similar to the time necessary for rescuer rotation, and presents the same workflow as manual cpr.Hence, based on available information, the patients' outcome was not negatively impacted by the interruptions when compared to standard of care manual cpr.Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (ohca) is one of the main causes of death in industrial nations.About 25% of patients survive this event and make it to the hospital, and even fewer patients survive after 24 hours (nichol, nejm, 2015).In the united states, survival to hospital discharge after non-traumatic emergency medical services-treated cardiac arrest with any first recorded rhythm was 10.6% for patients of any age.Of the bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in 2011, 31.4% of victims survived to hospital discharge (mozaffarian, circulation, 2016).Death is an expected outcome for ohca.
|
During the call, the autopulse platform (sn (b)(4)) was used on an (b)(6) male patient ((b)(6)) in cardiac arrest.The cardiac arrest was witnessed.Per the reporter, the patient had an extensive medical history.The platform stopped after the first compression.No error messages were displayed on the platform lcd screen.Troubleshooting steps were performed without any success.The use of the autopulse platform was discontinued and manual cpr was performed.A return of spontaneous circulation (rosc) was not achieved, the patient was in asystole through the entire event and never presented a shockable rhythm.Cause of death is unknown.According to the reporter, the patient's death was not related to the delay caused by the device issue.
|