Lot and serial number of the disposable device not provided by the complainant, therefore the expiration date is not known.The device has not yet been returned therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.Lot number of the disposable device not provided by the complainant, therefore the manufacture date is not known.Device history record (dhr) review and sterile lot review were unable to be conducted for the disposable device as the lot number was not provided by the complainant.Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
|
It was initially reported that during the use of a myosure tissue removal device that a uterine perforation and bowel resection occurred.The patient was rushed to the hospital for emergency surgery.Additional information obtained noted that for hysteroscopic fluid distention saline was used from an iv bag with a blood pressure cuff, along with wall suction for outflow.Ultrasound guidance was employed during the procedure.The fibroid was noted to have an intramural component, located on the lateral sidewall, approximately 2.5cms.After noting adequate visualization with hysteroscopy the myosure device was inserted and the physician then experienced difficulty visualizing the cavity.To improve the visual field the physician inserted the device further into the cavity while activating the cutting mechanism of the myosure.The visual field was still not cleared, but it became apparent that a uterine perforation had occurred.Further investigation revealed a perforation of the small bowel requiring resection and primary anastomosis.The fluid deficit was 1 liter.
|