• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH UNKNOWN_CORK_PRODUCT; UNKNOWN HIP IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH UNKNOWN_CORK_PRODUCT; UNKNOWN HIP IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_SHC
Device Problems Degraded (1153); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Injury (2348); Reaction (2414); Metal Related Pathology (4530)
Event Date 01/23/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The information in this report was provided by stryker orthopaedics legal affairs department.No additional information is available at this time due to the ongoing litigation.Should additional information become available, the evaluation summary will be submitted in a supplemental report.Device not returned.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the filing of a lawsuit that allegedly the patient was implanted with an lfit anatomic cocr v40 femoral head on his left hip on or about (b)(6) 2006 and was revised on (b)(6) 2014.It is further alleged that he suffered injuries as a result of implantation and explantation of the device at issue, device recall and excessive levels of chromium and cobalt in his blood.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding abnormal ion level involving an accolade stem that was mated with an lfit v40 cocr head was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: device evaluation and results: not performed as the device remains implanted.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: 'i have had the opportunity to review documentation related to pi including a product inquiry summary, an implant sheet from the index 2006 tha surgery and an operative report from the revision surgery.The event description from the product inquiry summary states: it was reported through the filing of a lawsuit that allegedly the patient was implanted with an lfit anatomic cocr v40 femoral head on his left hip on or about (b)(6) 2006 and was revised on (b)(6) 2014.It is further alleged that he suffered injuries as a result of implantation and explantation of the device at issue, device recall and excessive levels of chromium and cobalt in his blood.The 2006 implant record conforms an accolade stem with 40mm metal head was implanted along with a titanium shell and polyethylene liner.The revision operative report confirmed polyethylene liner wear.It also describes a layer of "dead and mummified tissue" within the hip.The surgeon opined that he thought was a local tissue reaction caused by osteolysis.No trunnion damaged was noted following removal of the femoral head.Revision surgery is confirmed.No documentation confirming altr or elevated serum metal ions was provided.The root cause of the polyethylene wear cannot be determined from the limited documentation provided.Should additional information become available i would be happy to further this assessment.' device history review: a review of the device history records indicates devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock on with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: no other similar events were reported for the lot.Conclusion: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: ' the 2006 implant record conforms an accolade stem with 40mm metal head was implanted along with a titanium shell and polyethylene liner.The revision operative report confirmed polyethylene liner wear.It also describes a layer of "dead and mummified tissue" within the hip.The surgeon opined that he thought was a local tissue reaction caused by osteolysis.No trunnion damaged was noted following removal of the femoral head.' no further investigation for this event is required at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the filing of a lawsuit that allegedly the patient was implanted with an lfit anatomic cocr v40 femoral head on his left hip on or about (b)(6) 2006 and was revised on (b)(6) 2014.It is further alleged that he suffered injuries as a result of implantation and explantation of the device at issue, device recall and excessive levels of chromium and cobalt in his blood.Update as per medical records received 06-oct-2023: "the patient had significant layer from almost dead and mummified tissue inside the joint, most likely due to unusual reaction to osteolysis.All these tissues were meticulously removed and irrigated.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN_CORK_PRODUCT
Type of Device
UNKNOWN HIP IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-CORK
ida industrial estate
carrigtwohill NA
EI   NA
Manufacturer Contact
anna ryan
raheen business park
limerick NA
EI   NA
61498200
MDR Report Key8404405
MDR Text Key138256768
Report Number0002249697-2019-01280
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MEH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K121308
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/15/2023
2 Devices were Involved in the Event: 1   2  
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/08/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator No Information
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_SHC
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/26/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/15/2006
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age63 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-