• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAQUET CRITICAL CARE AB SERVO-U; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAQUET CRITICAL CARE AB SERVO-U; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 6694800
Device Problems No Display/Image (1183); Decrease in Pressure (1490); Failure to Read Input Signal (1581); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896)
Patient Problem Decreased Respiratory Rate (2485)
Event Date 02/18/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The manufacturer report # for this event is 8010042-2019-00154.
 
Event Description
It was reported that while the ventilator was connected to a patient, it started alarming peep low, pressure delivery restricted and later displayed a technical error indicating a communication error.The right hand of the screen was blank and the screen was irresponsive to touch.The clinicians noticed that the patient was not being ventilated.Stoppage of ventilation was confirmed by the respiratory therapist by disconnecting the circuit from the patient.The patient¿s sao2 dropped to 66%.The patient was immediately removed from the ventilator and ventilated with 100% fio2 resuscitator bag and saturation went back to normal.The final patient outcome was no harm.Fda reference#: mw5084320.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Fda reference#: mw5084320.Manufacturer reference#: (b)(4).Importer reference #:(b)(4).The manufacturer report # for this event is 8010042-2019-00154.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The onsite investigation of the ventilator after the event found no fault and the investigation of the returned control cable did not reproduce the problem.The evaluation of logs confirms the occurrence of the reported technical error but there was no evidence of stop of ventilation.The other mentioned peep low and pressure delivery restricted alarms, which indicate leakage, patient circuit disconnected and finally loss of gas supply, were not visible on the screen but these lead to less or no gas to the patient.These were the most probable cause of the inadequate ventilation of the patient.The conclusion in the matter is that data communication to the panel ceased which was described as the screen being unresponsive.The technical error was displayed on screen but further update of the screen with new information or making changes were not possible due to this communication failure.However, the ventilator was all along working and alarming but the communication issues prevented the correct alarms to be shown on the screen.The inadequate ventilation to the patient was due to leakage and the loss of gases to the ventilator.It has not been determined whether the patient circuit disconnections alarms were due to excessive leakage.Loss of gas supply to the ventilator, leakage or patient circuit disconnection will result in less or no gases delivered to the patient.The cause of the technical error has not been determined.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SERVO-U
Type of Device
VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAQUET CRITICAL CARE AB
roentgenvagen 2
solna
MDR Report Key8416633
MDR Text Key138821397
Report Number3013876692-2019-00003
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CBK
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K151814
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Distributor
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/12/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number6694800
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA02/12/2020
Distributor Facility Aware Date02/12/2020
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer02/12/2020
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received03/13/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/12/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/12/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-