Analysis: the returned express chest drain was removed from the outer packaging.There was a large hair on the outer bag in which the drain was shipped.The bag was removed and the drain removed.The drain was in the original package that had been opened.There was a small piece of hair stuck to a piece of tape that was placed by the institution.The details of the drain indicate that the hair was noticed in the sealed drain.Unfortunately the drain has been opened and there is no way to confirm that the hair was introduced prior to the final packaging sealing operation or if it was introduced in the field when the drain was opened.A review of the manufacturing packaging procedure mp009267 rev ad shows that there are two 100% inspections conducted for particulate during the process of packaging the chest drain.The first 100% particulate inspection conducted is during the blue csr wrapping process and the second 100% inspection is conducted just prior to the pouching sealing process.Based on the details within the inspection process hairs of any kind are not allowed.A review of the scrap reason codes within the device history records also show that there were no devices reject during the manufacture or inspection of the express chest drain lot in question for hair being present in the packaging materials.Conclusion: based on the investigation atrium medical corporation cannot conclude that the hair was present in the package prior to the institution opening the sealed pouch of the chest drain or fell into the pouch upon opening the sealed pouch at the institution.All chest drains are manufactured and packaged within a clean room environment where all efforts are made to ensure that the chest drains are clean and free of loose fibers or hairs.The procedure for gowning prior to entering the clean room requires all staff members to be suited in a one piece full body gown with two separate bouffant caps that cover all hair and beard covers if required and full foot coverage booties.
|