• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CONMED CORPORATION A-BEAM-3; ARGON PROBE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CONMED CORPORATION A-BEAM-3; ARGON PROBE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number A-BEAM-3
Device Problem Use of Device Problem (1670)
Patient Problems Perforation (2001); Bowel Perforation (2668)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Complaint is inconclusive.Verbal complaint; device will not be returned for evaluation and no photographic evidence was provided therefore root cause cannot be identified.A lot history review could not be conducted as a lot number was not provided.The device history record could not be reviewed as a lot number was not provided.A two-year review of complaint history revealed there has been 2 complaints regarding 2 devices for this device family and failure mode.During the same time frame (b)(4) devices have been manufactured and shipped worldwide.Should all the complaint devices have been found confirmed, the rate of failure would be (b)(4).Per the instructions for use, the user is advised the following; never activate the argon beam probe when in direct contact to the tissue as this may cause a mild embolism or a risk of perforation.The distal end of the probe must always be within the field of view of the endoscope before and during activation of the beam.Never activate the beam without visually checking.Be sure that the proper path from the patient return electrode to the electrocautery unit is maintained throughout the procedure.This issue will continue to be monitored through the complaint system to assure patient safety.
 
Event Description
The customer reported that the a-beam-3, argon probe was used in the right colon during a avm ablation procedure.The doctor was using a higher setting (30w.7l/min) than recommended for a right colon ablation.The patient was re-admitted 24hrs later for a bowel perforation.The doctor does not think the machine or probe caused this injury.There was no delay in the procedure.This report is being raised based on patient injury due to the patient having to be re-admitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
A-BEAM-3
Type of Device
ARGON PROBE
Manufacturer (Section D)
CONMED CORPORATION
525 french road
utica NY 13502 5994
Manufacturer (Section G)
CONMED CORPORATION
525 french road
utica NY 13502 5994
Manufacturer Contact
melanie hansen
11311 concept boulevard
largo, FL 33773
7273995209
MDR Report Key8457224
MDR Text Key140034041
Report Number1320894-2019-00061
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K081644
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/27/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/27/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberA-BEAM-3
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/06/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
CE200, BEAMER MATE ESU, SN# (B)(4)
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age85 YR
-
-