|
Model Number ONXAC-21 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Thrombosis (2100)
|
Event Date 02/18/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This investigation is currently ongoing.Any additional information will be provided in the follow-up report.
|
|
Event Description
|
According to the initial report, patient, female, on-x aortic implantation 2004.(b)(6) inr >2.5.2-3 weeks ago thrombosis.After treatment patient is well again.Additional information received relays that the patient had the onxac-21 implanted on (b)(6) 2004 due to high-grade as (bicuspid aortic valve, sievers type i).The patient was hospitalized on (b)(6) 2019 to (b)(6) 2019.The patient's symptoms were dyspnea, vertigo, cardiac decompression.During the hospitalization the patient had an ecg that showed af (atrial fibrillation), pvc (premature ventricular contraction), heart rate 30bpm.A blood test showed inr: 2.7, crp: 27mg/l, trop t: 22.44 ng/l, nt-pro-bnp: 1431 ng/l.Tte showed restricted leaflet motion, av vmax: 3.6 m/s, av ppg: 52mm hg, ef: 48%, tr, tv max: 3.5 m/s, tv ppg: 65mm hg.Tee showed restricted leaflet motion, av vmax: 3.5 m/s, ppg: 48mm hg.Therapy performed: ufh (unfractionated heparin) perfusion and injection.Follow-up: osc (oral anticoagulant) plus antiplatelet (marcoumar plus thromboass, target inr: 2-3), re-evaluation in 3 months.Echo images have been requested from referring hospital.
|
|
Event Description
|
According to the initial report, patient, female, on-x aortic implantation 2004.Inr >2.5.2-3 weeks ago thrombosis.After treatment patient is well again.Additional information received relays that the patient had the onxac-21 implanted on (b)(6) 2004 due to high-grade as (bicuspid aortic valve, sievers type i).The patient was hospitalized on (b)(6) 2019 to (b)(6) 2019.The patient's symptoms were dyspnea, vertigo, cardiac decompression.During the hospitalization the patient had an ecg that showed af (atrial fibrillation), pvc (premature ventricular contraction), heart rate 30bpm.A blood test showed inr: 2.7, crp: 27mg/l, trop t: 22.44 ng/l, nt-pro-bnp: 1431 ng/l.Tte showed restricted leaflet motion, av vmax: 3.6 m/s, av ppg: 52mm hg, ef: 48%, tr, tv max: 3.5 m/s, tv ppg: 65mm hg.Tee showed restricted leaflet motion, av vmax: 3.5 m/s, ppg: 48mm hg.Therapy performed: ufh (unfractionated heparin) perfusion and injection.Follow-up: osc (oral anticoagulant) plus antiplatelet (marcoumar plus thromboass, target inr: 2-3), re-evaluation in 3 months.Echo images have been requested from referring hospital.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A root cause for the reported event is thrombosis, but we do not know the origin of the clot.The abnormal cardiac rhythm may be a contributing factor in its formation but we otherwise do not have clear evidence of what, if any, contribution the valve had to it.The manufacturing records were reviewed and it was confirmed that all records were controlled, available for review, and met specifications prior to release.Thromboembolic events are a recognized risk factor for mechanical heart valve replacement.The risk management file thoroughly identifies the process and product hazards for approved indications.Each individual hazard is mitigated and reduced as low as possible by design and process.There is no indication that an error or deficiency occurred at cryolife, inc.And the ifu adequately communicates risk.No further action is necessary.This event does not identify additional hazards or modify the probability and severity of existing hazards.This report is being submitted as required by federal regulations and does not constitute an admission that the device caused or contributed to the reported event.Furthermore, this report reflects the event as alleged by the complainant and does not imply that the information reported to cryolife is accurate or has been confirmed by cryolife.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|