• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION AORTIC AP; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION AORTIC AP; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 505DA18
Device Problem Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 03/08/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: no product was returned.Conclusion: without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that 16 years post implant of this mechanical valve, implanted in a three year old pediatric patient, the valve was explanted and replaced with a new valve due to patient prosthesis mismatch.No additional adverse patient effects were reported. .
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic¿s quality laboratory, visual examination revealed that there was discoloration on the returned valve which is evident of blood contact.There were remnants of pannus on the sewing ring adjacent to the black guide line.Both leaflets were received in the closed position.Leaflet motion was tested, and the leaflets appeared to move without difficulty and were intact with no evidence of damage.The orifice appeared intact with no evidence of damage.Both inflow and outflow valve hinge mechanisms appeared intact.Four black guide lines were noted which is indicative of a mitral valve.Based on the four guide lines and the ifu review, the returned valve was determined to be an ap mitral heart valve.Calibrated measurements confirmed the device met specification for size.Conclusion: the cause of the issue may have due to patient anatomy.Added device serial number field d updated device codes, eval code method, eval code-result field 2:6 medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A2: patient age corrected.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AORTIC AP
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
3800 annapolis lane
minneapolis MN 55447
MDR Report Key8494268
MDR Text Key141304582
Report Number3008592544-2019-00017
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P990046
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign,health pr
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/09/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/09/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number505DA18
Device Catalogue Number505DA18
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/02/2019
Date Manufacturer Received12/13/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age19 YR
-
-