This report was initially submitted following notification from a customer in the united states regarding misidentification results when performing validation testing with the vitek® ms instrument (b)(4).The customer had an instrument replacement.They performed validation testing on the new instrument with four patient samples that had previously identified as enterobacter cloacae/asburiae (50/50 split) on their previous vitek ms instrument.Biomérieux investigation was conducted.Based on the customer information, the expected identification is the result obtained with the original vitek ms (i.E.Low discrimination to enterobacter cloacae / enterobacter asburiae).No further information has been received regarding any other testing methods used by the customer to confirm an organism identification.Evaluation of the submitted test data showed that the vitek ms systems (both the original unit and the new unit) were operational.In addition, the customer's spot preparation quality seemed to be homogeneous.This could be extrapolated to the sample preparation quality.The test data was re-processed using vitek ms kb v3.3 (under development); all spectra except one led to the same identification result (enterobacter hormaechei spp hoffmannii).With kb 3.3, modifications were made for the identification of enterobacter species.Strains have been re-classified with more accurate sequencing methods (gyrb).The investigation concluded the root cause as the vitek ms kb v3.2 knowledge base capabilities related to this specific organism identification of enterobacter cloacae.
|