It was reported that left hip revision surgery was performed.During the revision, the bhr cup, hemi head and modular sleeve were removed.The synergy stem remained implanted.As of today, device return and additional information has been requested for this complaint but has not become available.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.Review of manufacturing records did not reveal any waivers, concessions, manufacturing or material abnormalities that could have contributed to this issue.The available medical documents were reviewed.It should be noted that the implantation intraoperative report noted reaming to 61 and placement of 62mm bhr acetabular cup.However, the revision intra-operative report indicated that the 62mm smith and nephew acetabular component was extracted.The acetabulum was then deepened and reamed to a 58-mm diameter, with a 58-mm trabecular metal acetabular component pressed into place, which may be inconsistent with the devices reportedly used.The mva as well as the radiological and intra-operative findings of the over-sized head and mal-positioned acetabular cannot be ruled out as contributing factors to the reported failed acetabular component.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
|