|
Model Number 45007 |
Device Problem
Suction Problem (2170)
|
Patient Problem
Embolism (1829)
|
Event Date 04/23/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the device lost aspiration.A 2.4mm jetstream xc catheter was selected for an atherectomy procedure in the left popliteal artery.The device primed with no issue.During the procedure, the jetstream catheter partially lost aspiration.The device was removed and re-flushed, re-primed and put back in.The catheter was still losing aspiration, embolism was noted, and bubbles of air were noted in the device.Another jetstream device was selected and the procedure was completed.The distal emboli was aspirated with this second device.There were no further patient complications were reported and the patient is fine.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the device lost aspiration.A 2.4mm jetstream xc catheter was selected for an atherectomy procedure in the left popliteal artery.The device primed with no issue.During the procedure, the jetstream catheter partially lost aspiration.The device was removed and re-flushed, re-primed and put back in.The catheter was still losing aspiration, embolism was noted, and bubbles of air were noted in the device.Another jetstream device was selected and the procedure was completed.The distal emboli was aspirated with this second device.There were no further patient complications were reported and the patient is fine.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluated by mfr: returned product consisted of a jetstream xc-2.4 atherectomy catheter.The device was visually examined for any shaft damage and the functional testing of the device was completed.The device showed no damage.Functional analysis was completed.Test results showed that this device did not perform as designed per the test procedure specification sheet, withdrawing 1 ml of fluid in the 1-minute time frame.Dissection of the catheter shaft showed that the aspiration lumen was occluded with a heavy clot burden which contributed to the aspiration issues.Inspection of the remainder of the device, revealed no damage or irregularities.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|