The device was not returned for evaluation.A potential root cause of the reported event could be that the materials of construction were not biocompatible with the patient due to which there was an allergic reaction, resulting in severe uti.The lot number is unknown; therefore, the device history record could not be reviewed.The instructions for use were found adequate and state the following: "not recommended for use on patients with a known latex allergy." h11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : the device was not returned.
|