• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROVENTION, INC. HYDROFRAME FRAMING COIL; EMBOLIZATION COIL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROVENTION, INC. HYDROFRAME FRAMING COIL; EMBOLIZATION COIL Back to Search Results
Model Number 100408HFRM-V
Device Problems Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/26/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The lot number was provided.A search for non-conformances associated with this part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.A lot history trending review was performed and there were no similar complaints for this lot number.The device has been returned to the manufacturer.The investigation is underway.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during the treatment of an anterior communicating aneurysm, the coil was advanced out approximately 2cm.During removal, resistance was encountered, and the coil detached in the aneurysm.The coil was successfully removed with a snare device.Several attempts were made to clarify if the coil was thermally detached or detached; however, no further clarifying information has been provided.There was no reported patient injury.The patient was reported to be fine.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was received with the dispenser hoop, introducer sheath, delivery pusher, and the implant, which was detached from the delivery pusher.The heater coil of the pusher did not have any burn damage, but did display compression damage.The rest of the pusher did not display any other notable damage.The implant had multiple kinks.The attachment monofilament displayed a tail shape.The root cause of the implant detaching is most likely due to the monofilament experiencing a force over the maximum specification, as indicated by the physical characteristics of the monofilament tip.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HYDROFRAME FRAMING COIL
Type of Device
EMBOLIZATION COIL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROVENTION, INC.
35 enterprise drive
aliso viejo CA 92656
MDR Report Key8593169
MDR Text Key144538422
Report Number2032493-2019-00132
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00812636026985
UDI-Public(01)00812636026985(11)180829(17)230731(10)1808295UF
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K090357
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/11/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2023
Device Model Number100408HFRM-V
Device Lot Number1808295UF
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/23/2019
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/11/2019
Initial Date FDA Received05/08/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/11/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/19/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age51 YR
Patient Weight24
-
-