• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC THERMOCOOL® SMART TOUCH¿ ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY CATHETER; SIMILAR DEVICE D133601, PMA # P030031/S053

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC THERMOCOOL® SMART TOUCH¿ ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY CATHETER; SIMILAR DEVICE D133601, PMA # P030031/S053 Back to Search Results
Catalog Number D133604IL
Device Problem Crack (1135)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 01/15/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The biosense webster inc.Product analysis lab received the device for evaluation on 4/11/2019.The analysis has begun but is not completed at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 30104056m number, and no non-conformances was found during the review.Manufacturer's ref.No: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient underwent an atrial fibrillation (afib) procedure with a thermocool® smart touch¿ electrophysiology catheter and the biosense webster, inc.Product analysis lab noted that the pebax sleeve was damaged.Initially, during the procedure, the temperature could not be displayed.The thermocool® smart touch¿ electrophysiology catheter was exchanged and the procedure was completed.There was no patient consequence reported.The temperature issue was assessed as not reportable.The ablation cannot be performed since there is no radio frequency energy applied.The most likely consequence was an intraprocedural delay.The potential that it could cause or contribute to a death or serious injury, or other significant adverse event, was remote.The biosense webster, inc.Product analysis lab received the device for evaluation and noted on april 11, 2019 that the helix spring was bent inside the pebax sleeve approximately 5 mm from the distal end of the tip dome.The pebax sleeve was damaged approximately 6 mm from the distal end of the tip dome.The pebax sleeve being damaged was assessed as a reportable issue as the integrity of the device was compromised.The awareness date of this reportable lab finding is april 11, 2019.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Originally the pebax sleeve was described to have damage.Further clarification was provided on may 15, 2019 on the damage stating that the damage observed appeared to be a potential cut in the pebax sleeve.This damage on the pebax remains assessed as reportable.Additional testing was performed on may 15, 2019 and the scanning electron microscope (sem) analysis showed evidence of mechanical damage.Scratches, stress marks and several holes were observed on the pebax surface.It is possible that the damage was caused by an unknown object.No other anomalies were observed.The damage on the pebax remains assessed as reportable.Investigation summary: it was reported that a patient underwent an atrial fibrillation (afib) procedure with a thermocool® smart touch¿ electrophysiology catheter.During the procedure, the temperature could not be displayed.The thermocool® smart touch¿ electrophysiology catheter was exchanged and the procedure was completed.There was no patient consequence reported.The device was inspected and the helix spring was found bent and a cut appeared to be in the pebax.Then, a tilt test was performed and the tip was found out of specifications.Then, electrical test was performed and the catheter failed, no electrical readings were observed on electrode # 1.A failure analysis was performed and the catheter was dissected on the tip area, the electrical wire was found broken causing the improper electrical signal.In addition, the thermocouple values were found out of specification.A failure analysis was performed and it was found that there was an electrical intermittence on the tip area creating the temperature issue.Additionally, a scanning electron microscope (sem) testing was performed on the pebax area and the results showed evidence of mechanical damage.Scratches, stress marks and several holes were observed on the pebax surface.It is possible that damage was caused by an unknown object.No other anomalies were observed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed and no internal actions related to the reported complaint were identified.The customer complaint was confirmed.The root cause of the electrical wire breakage and the damage on the catheter tip cannot be related to the manufacturing process since there is evidence that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures, it could be related to the manipulation of the device during the procedure; however, this cannot be conclusively determined.The temperature issue does not represent any patient safety impact since the device is unable to deliver radio frequency energy to ablate.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THERMOCOOL® SMART TOUCH¿ ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY CATHETER
Type of Device
SIMILAR DEVICE D133601, PMA # P030031/S053
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC
33 technology drive
irvine CA 92618
MDR Report Key8598257
MDR Text Key145966243
Report Number2029046-2019-03110
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LPB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/20/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/29/2019
Device Catalogue NumberD133604IL
Device Lot Number30104056M
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/11/2019
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/11/2019
Initial Date FDA Received05/10/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/15/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/04/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-