As the valve was not received for analysis and the serial number remains unknown, no device investigation can be performed.It is possible that the patients clinical condition and risk factors contributed to the reported degeneration; however, as limited patient information is known this cannot be confirmed and the root cause remains unknown.It should be noted that structural valve deterioration is listed in the perceval ifu among the possible adverse events associated with cardiac valve replacement with a bioprosthesis.The reported event is therefore a known, inherent risk of the procedure.
|
A mitroflow lxa25 was implanted on (b)(6) 2012.The operation was reportedly a success.In the months after the operation, the patient reported recurrence of his pre-operative symptoms (shortness of breath, sensation in chest, lethargy).On (b)(6) 2013, an echocardiogram was performed, which did not reveal any abnormalities.In (b)(6) 2014, the patient returned with the same symptoms, and was referred for education on aortic valve stenosis and exercise.In (b)(6) 2014, the patient returned for follow-up, again with persistent symptoms.Another echo was performed, and a follow-up echo was scheduled for one year later.The patient's symptoms persisted until 2015.They reportedly had recurrent attacks -3-4 times per week, almost resulting in loss of consciousness.On (b)(6) 2015, a second physician reviewed the patient's medical records and echo results, and it was declared that the replacement had failed and required replacement.In (b)(6) 2016, reoperation was performed due to calcification of the valve leaflets.
|