(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.Date of event, test date, implant date: estimated dates.Unique device identifier (udi#): in the absence of a reported part number, the udi cannot be calculated.The device was not returned for analysis.The lot history record (lhr) for this product could not be reviewed and a similar incident query could not be performed because the product was not returned for evaluation and the part and lot numbers were not reported.The investigation was unable to determine a cause for the reported tip detachment.It may be possible that interaction with the tip and calcification contributed to the tip detachment; however, this could not be confirmed.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat the heavily calcified lesion in the popliteal artery.Following preparation of the vessel, an unspecified supera self-expanding stent was deployed with nice result.All steps prior to removal of the delivery system were performed; however, during removal of the delivery system under fluoroscopy it was noted that the distal part of the delivery catheter was not on the device.The separated tip of the delivery system was noted in the patient and it was canulated to a distal collateral without an exit.An unspecified balloon was used to push the separated tip into the artery.The results were great.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|