Based on the provided information and tests performed on site, there is no indication of a malfunction of the mri system that contributed to the injury.The shape and place of the injury corresponds with the rim of the posterior coil element that was connected, but not used during scanning.It is concluded that the posterior element of the synergy head/neck coil contributed to the injury.The posterior element shows physical damage and should not have been used for scanning.Possible contributing factors are: several scans with high sar values (> 2 w/kg) in combination with a long total examination time.This lead to a high rf energy dose for the patient that increases the risk of rf energy related injuries.The positioning of the foot in the tilted synergy head/neck coil with the posterior coil element connected.The rim of the posterior coil element has caused pressure on the lower leg at the place of the injury and reduced the local blood flow.
|