(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.Age: mean age.Sex: majority of patients were male.Date of event: estimated date.Udi #: udi is unk because the part and lot number were not provided.Implant date: estimated date.Article titled: "three to four year outcomes of the absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus second-generation drug-eluting stent: a meta-analysis." the device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the lot history record and complaint history of the reported lot could not be conducted because the part and lot numbers were not provided.The reported potential adverse event of death is listed in the absorb gt1 bioresorbable vascular scaffold (bvs) system instructions for use as a known adverse event that may be associated with treatment procedures and the use of a coronary scaffold.A conclusive cause for the reported patient effect, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.The xience device referenced is being filed under a separate medwatch report #.The additional adverse patient effects of mi, revascularization, and thrombosis referenced are being filed under a separate medwatch report #.
|
It was reported through a research article identifying the absorb scaffold and xience drug eluting stent that may be related to a cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularization, and thrombosis.Details are listed in the article titled "three to four years outcomes of the absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus second-generation drug-eluting stent: a meta-analysis" by goel et al.
|