• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: REVERSE MEDICAL CORPORATION MICROVASCULAR PLUG; DEVICE, EMBOLIZATION, VASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

REVERSE MEDICAL CORPORATION MICROVASCULAR PLUG; DEVICE, EMBOLIZATION, VASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number MVP-9Q
Device Problem Difficult or Delayed Separation (4044)
Patient Problem Occlusion (1984)
Event Date 05/21/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that the medtronic plug encountered difficulties detaching.Once it detached, it migrated and failed to occlude the intended vessel.A different plug was implanted to seal the vessel off completely.Additional information was required to determine the cause of the event.The hcp was contacted for additional information and response was received.As the device remained in the patient and the pushwire was disposed of; therefore, no analysis could be performed.There was no indication that the event was related to a potential manufacturing issue and no dhr was requested, so a device history record review was not performed.The investigation determined that this was a known event, and therefore no new formal investigation was required.Common sequences of events and contributing factors that can lead to this known event are documented in the risk management file.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received report that the medtronic plug encountered difficulties detaching.Once it detached, it migrated and failed to occlude the intended vessel.Prior to the event, the plug was positioned in the desired location and then attempt to detach was made but physician felt that there was no detachment and seemed like the plug did not oppose the vessel wall possibly due to inappropriate size or flared vessel.Once the plug detached, it travelled further a few centimeters.Since there was not complete occlusion, a similar amplatzer 12 was placed to seal the laii completely.Since purpose of the plug was to occlude the vessel, there was no harm in patient.The patient's vasculature was minimal in tortuosity.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MICROVASCULAR PLUG
Type of Device
DEVICE, EMBOLIZATION, VASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
REVERSE MEDICAL CORPORATION
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
REVERSE MEDICAL CORPORATION
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
katcha taylor
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
7635263305
MDR Report Key8696732
MDR Text Key147928405
Report Number3007170829-2019-00003
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeNL
PMA/PMN Number
K150108
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/13/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/13/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/28/2019
Device Model NumberMVP-9Q
Device Lot NumberA534200
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/21/2019
Date Device Manufactured10/04/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age70 YR
Patient Weight85
-
-