• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LIVANOVA USA, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 102; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LIVANOVA USA, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 102; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 102
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Protective Measures Problem (3015)
Patient Problem Seizures (2063)
Event Date 08/25/2008
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
A report was received that a patient has been referred for replacement due to battery depletion.Further information revealed the patient also had an increase in seizures the generator has been explanted and replaced.The explanted generator has been received by the manufacturer for product analysis.Analysis is underway but has not been completed to date.No other relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
Analysis was approved for a generator replaced due to battery depletion, and the patient experiencing increased seizures.Upon receipt, the device was operating on low battery voltage and the elective replacement indicator (eri) flag was set.An open can measurement of the battery voltage confirmed that the eri flag had been properly set; confirming that the battery was ¿depleted¿.The device output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs, while the generator was placed in a simulated body temperature environment.Although the battery was depleted, monitoring results showed minor variations in the pulse generator¿s output signal and demonstrated that the device provided an expected level of output current for the monitoring period.The pulse generator diagnostics were as expected for the programmed parameters.A comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator did not perform according to functional specifications.Both of the backup capacitor¿s to can measurements did not meet specification due to an open condition for the positive backup capacitors.Additionally, the positive backup capacitor anomaly affected the waveshape pulse overshoot measurement.After the positive backup capacitor was bridged device performed according to functional specifications.Visual analysis of the feed thru capacitors showed separation of the silver polyimide to the feed-thru wire connection causing "a considered open positive backup capacitor condition.¿ it is suspected that the positive backup capacitor was not electrically attached to the feedthru wire.Other than the noted open emi capacitor, there were no other performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.No other relevant information has been received to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 102
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
rachel kohn
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key8704948
MDR Text Key148200496
Report Number1644487-2019-01160
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/12/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/17/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date07/08/2010
Device Model Number102
Device Lot Number200900
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/13/2019
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received06/18/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/25/2008
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age52 YR
-
-