|
Model Number M00542251 |
Device Problems
Use of Device Problem (1670); Failure to Fire (2610)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 05/22/2019 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Although the suspect device has been received, the evaluation has not been completed.Therefore, the cause of the reported malfunction has not been determined.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a speedband superview super 7 device was used in the stomach during an endoscopic variceal band ligation (evl) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the bands would not deploy.There was no difficulty in setting up the device.The procedure was completed with another speedband superview super 7 device.Additionally, the ligator shrink wrap on the device was removed prior to the setup process.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a speedband superview super 7 device was used in the stomach during an endoscopic variceal band ligation (evl) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the bands would not deploy.There was no difficulty in setting up the device.The procedure was completed with another speedband superview super 7 device.Additionally, the ligator shrink wrap on the device was removed prior to the setup process.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Block h6: problem code 2610 for the reportable issue of bands failed to deploy.Block h10: investigation results received one speedband superview super 7 with the ligator head for analysis.It was noticed that the crimp was present on the trip wire.A visual examination of the ligator head found one band present which was moved out of its original position.It was noticed that the ligator head teeth were bent.The trip wire was secured in the handle assembly slot when received.The suture was cut, attached to the trip wire loop and the other section was attached to the ligator head.A functional evaluation was performed by rotating the handle knob 180 degrees, an audible click was heard and indents were felt.No issue was noted with the handle assembly.Additionally, the ligator head was not in its plastic wrap when received.The returned device review showed that the device was not used per the directions for use (dfu)/product label.Based on the evaluation of the returned device, the physician removed the ligator shrink wrap earlier in the setup process and it is the step number 10 in the dfu.This failure is likely related to misuse of the device without any design or manufacturing issue.Therefore, the most probable root cause is failure to follow instructions.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed and confirmed that this device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.A labeling review was performed and from the information available, this device was not used per the directions for use (dfu) / product label; as the ligator shrink wrap on the device was removed prior to the setup process.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|