This report is for an unknown synthes vertical expandable prosthetic titanium ribs (veptr)/unknown lot.Part and lot number are unknown.Without the specific part number; the udi number and 510-k number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.(b)(4).Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).
|
This report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: thakar, c., rolton, d.And nnadi, c.(2014), the surgical treatment of complex early onset syndromal scoliosis using a remotely expandable device, european spine journal, vol.23 (no.1), pages s93-s139 (united kingdom).The aim of this study is to demonstrate potential applications of the magec system in complex syndromal scoliosis.A total of 3 patients (2 males and 1 female) were included in the study.Of the 3, only 1 patient was treated using vertical expandable prosthetic titanium ribs (veptr) but was removed and converted with a competitor device.The following complications were reported as follows: case 3: (b)(6) year-old boy with vacterl syndrome and in situ tracheostomy required multiple revisions complicated by infection.General anaesthesia was complicated by respiratory compromise.A competitor device inserted after removal of veptr.Distraction was performed at 6 months due to concerns about the proximal fixation.This report is for an unknown synthes vertical expandable prosthetic titanium ribs (veptr).This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|