The reason for this complaint was the bone tap breaking while reaming.The healthcare professional indicated there was a significant adverse event to the patient.There was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The primary surgery was completed as intended.The instrument was inspected prior to surgery and was found to be acceptable.The instrument was disposed of at the hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.Complaint database review showed previous complaints but there were no indications that this instrument has a design or material deficiency.Summary of complaints: 5 functional, 12 dull/worn, 1 locking mechanism damaged, 6 seized/galled, 4 threads damaged/galled, 25 bent, 37 broke/cracked/damaged, 5 end of life, 19 blank.The lot number was not reported; therefore, this instrument could not be linked to a specific device history record (dhr) or the actual date of manufacture could not be determined with confidence.The root cause of this event is attributable to damage due to sclerotic bone while reaming.The broken reamer was reported lost/discarded, therefore the reported problem could not be confirmed.This is not an event associated with a product failure, malfunction or issue.There are no indications that this instrument has a design or material deficiency therefore no containment of inventory is required.The return material authorization assigned to this complaint was issued in error since there will be no return of the item.The reported condition could possibly be a result of heavy use or misuse and care must be taken to avoid compromising their performance.Refer to the instrument instruction for use (ifu).Event is associated with instrument usage, not a design or manufacturing issue.
|