• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION UNKNOWN IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR; IMPLANTED SUBCORTICAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATOR (MOTOR DISORDERS)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION UNKNOWN IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR; IMPLANTED SUBCORTICAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATOR (MOTOR DISORDERS) Back to Search Results
Model Number NEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Problems Break (1069); High impedance (1291); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Malposition of Device (2616); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Intracranial Hemorrhage (1891); Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994); Seizures (2063); Seroma (2069); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271); Discomfort (2330); Impaired Healing (2378); Post Operative Wound Infection (2446)
Event Date 04/02/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Koy a, bockhorn n, kuhn aa, et al.Adverse events associated with deep brain stimulation in patients with childhood-onset dystonia.Brain stimulation 2019.Doi: 10.1016/j.Brs.2019.04.003.Country of event: the literature article noted that study data was collected from sites from two countries: (b)(6); however, it was not possible to determine which country occurred in.Age or date of birth: this value is the average age of the patients reported in the article as specific patients could not be identified.Sex: this value reflects the gender of the majority of the patients reported in the article as specific patients could not be identified.Date of event: please note that this date is based off of the date the article was accepted for publication as the event dates and publication date were not provided in the published literature.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: neu_unknown_ext, serial/lot #: unknown, udi #: asku.Product id: neu_unknown_lead, serial/lot #: unknown, udi #: asku.Product id: neu_unknown_lead, serial/lot #: unknown, udi #: asku.Product id: neu_unknown_lead, serial/lot #: unknown, udi #: asku.Product id: neu_unknown_lead, serial/lot #: unknown, udi #: asku.Product id: neu_unknown_lead, serial/lot #: unknown, udi #: asku.Product id: neu_unknown_ext, serial/lot #: unknown, udi #: asku.Product id: neu_ins_stimulator, serial/lot #: unknown, udi #: asku.Product id: neu_ins_stimulator, serial/lot #: unknown, udi #: asku.Product id: neu_unknown_ext, serial/lot #: unknown, udi #: asku.Product id: neu_ins_stimulator, serial/lot #: unknown, udi #: asku.Product id: neu_unknown_ext, serial/lot #: unknown, udi #: asku.Product id: neu_ins_stimulator, serial/lot #: unknown, udi #: asku.Product id: neu_unknown_ext, serial/lot #: unknown, udi #: asku.Product id: neu_ins_stimulator, serial/lot #: unknown, udi #: asku.Product id: neu_unknown_ext, serial/lot #: unknown, udi #: asku.Product id: neu_unknown_ext, serial/lot #: unknown, udi #: asku.Product id: neu_ins_stimulator, serial/lot #: unknown, udi #: asku.Product id: neu_ins_stimulator, serial/lot #: unknown, udi #: asku.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Summary: data on pediatric dbs is still limited because of small numbers in single center series and lack of systematic multi-center trials.The authors evaluate short- and long-term adverse events (aes) of patients undergoing deep brain stimulation (dbs) during childhood and adolescence.Data collected by the german registry on pediatric dbs (gepestim) were analyzed according to reversible and irreversible aes and time of occurrence with relation to dbs-surgery: intraoperative, perioperative (<4 weeks), postoperative (4 weeks < 6 months) and long term aes (>6 months).72 patients with childhood-onset dystonia from 10 dbs-centers, who received 173 dbs electrodes and 141 implantable pulse generators (ipg), were included in the registry.Mean time of postoperative follow-up was 4.6 ± 4 years.In total, 184 aes were documented in 53 patients (73.6%).52 dbs related aes in 26 patients (36.1%) required 45 subsequent surgical interventions 4.7 ± 4.1 years (range: 3 months -15 years) after initial implantation.The total risk of an ae requiring surgical intervention was 7.9% per electrode-year.Hardware-related aes were the most common reason for surgery.There was a tendency of a higher rate of aes in patients aged 7-9 years beyond 6 months after implantation.The intraoperative risk of aes in pediatric patients with dystonia undergoing dbs is very low, whereas the rate of postoperative hardware-related aes is a prominent feature with a higher occurrence compared to adults, especially on long-term follow-up.Factors leading to such aes must be identified and patient management has to be focused on risk minimization strategies in order to improve dbs therapy and maximize outcome in pediatric patients.Reported events: 12 patients experienced 15 instances of irreversible wound infection (defined by authors as requiring surgical intervention).Four of these patients had impaired wound healing and infection.Two instances of infection occurred in the peri-operative and extended into the short term interval, two occurred in the short-term interval, and the other 11 in the long-term interval.Eight of these instances required ins and/or extension removal/replacement, and seven required whole system removal/replacement.Explant due to recurrent infection was performed one year (2 patients) and four years (3 patients) after implant with one of the five patients being re-implanted.One patient with internal globus pallidus deep brain stimulation (gpi-dbs) experienced reversible, asymptomatic, right-sided intracranial hemorrhage in the peri-operative interval (defined as less than 4 weeks after dbs surgery).Bleeding was identified on post-operative imaging two days after pallidotomy and subsequent incomplete removal of lead on the same side and complete removal of the left lead, all within the same surgical session.Two patients experienced technical defect of the lead according to high impedances on the connecting sites in the long-term interval which required system removal/replacement.Four patients experienced lead dislocation/migration in the long-term interval which required system removal/replacement.One patient experienced lead malposition in the long-term interval, which required system removal/replacement.One patient experienced extension technical defect indicated by repeatedly measured high impedances on the connecting sites in the long term interval.The device was replaced.One patient experienced increased seizure frequency in the long term interval.Three patients experienced four instances of ins dislocation in the long-term post-op interval which required removal/replacement.Two patients experienced three instances of extension lead fracture in the long-term post-op interval which required removal/replacement.One patient experienced three instances of discomfort/pain in the long-term post-op interval which required extension lead revision and/or change of ins position.One patient experienced irreversible seroma in the short-term post-operative period and required ins and/or lead extension remo val/replacement.Eight patients experienced 11 instances of ins technical defect, one in the short-term post-op interval and 7 patients (10 instances) in the long-term interval, which required ins removal/replacement.One patient experienced extension technical defect in the short-term which required removal/replacement.Three patients experienced extension dislocation/migration, one in the short-term and two in the long term post-operative interval, which required removal/replacement.It was specified that in one patient it was the retro-auricular part that migrated.Five patients experienced reversible wound infection, three in the short-term post-operative interval and two in the long-term interval, which did not require explant.Six patients experienced lack or loss of efficacy in the long-term interval which required system replacement/removal in four patients and ins and/or extension replacement/removal in two patients.It was noted that the phenomenon of decreasing effect over time is mostly attributed to the progression of disease in patients with inherited forms of isolated or neurodegenerative dystonia.All patients were implanted with deep brain stimulation (dbs) for either isolated inherited and idiopathic dystonia, combined inherited and idiopathic dystonia, or acquired dystonia.The following device information was identified in the literature article: ins models 37612, 37601, 37602/37603, 7428, 7426.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR
Type of Device
IMPLANTED SUBCORTICAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATOR (MOTOR DISORDERS)
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
800 53rd ave ne
minneapolis MN 55421 1200
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
800 53rd ave ne
minneapolis MN 55421 1200
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key8733350
MDR Text Key149181657
Report Number3007566237-2019-01386
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MRU
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
H020007
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/25/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/26/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberNEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Catalogue NumberNEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/28/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age12 YR
-
-