Model Number 8300AB |
Device Problem
Perivalvular Leak (1457)
|
Patient Problem
Failure of Implant (1924)
|
Event Date 05/05/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was not returned to edwards for evaluation.Regurgitation is considered to be a perivalvular leak (pvl) if a turbulent eccentric jet originates between the bioprosthetic sewing ring and the annulus.While the majority of affected patients are asymptomatic, it can lead to significant morbidity including heart failure and hemolytic anemia.Pvl can occur in the mitral and aortic position for similar reasons, including technique and patient related factors.The type and cause of regurgitation varies depending upon multiple factors.Typically, mild regurgitation is not unusual after initial valve replacement, and is usually tolerated by patients.Often moderate to high regurgitation requiring re-operation in the immediate post-operation period is due to procedural related issues and is unrelated to the device.Regurgitation which develops progressively over time can be due to number of issues including patient related factors or structural valve deterioration.A definitive root cause could not be determined; however, it is likely that patient related factors and the progression of the underlying valvular disease pathology contributed to the event.Edwards lifesciences will continue to monitor all reported events.No further actions are required at this time.
|
|
Event Description
|
Edwards learned that a 27mm valve was explanted due to paravalvular leak (pvl) 8 days after the implant.As reported, paravalvular leak was observed 6 days after the implantation.The implantation of the valve went well.The surgeon placed 3 sutures in the ncc and 1 each in other 2 cusps (5 total) and patient was doing well post op.The valve was explanted 2 days after detection of the pvl and replaced with a 29mm valve.
|
|
Event Description
|
Edwards learnt that a 27mm valve was explanted due to paravalvular (pvl) 8 days after the implant.As reported, moderate to severe paravalvular leak was observed 6 days after the implantation.Patient had a very large bicuspid valve, the sizing for a 27mm valve appeared to be sufficient, but the valve turned out to be not quite large enough for the patients anatomy.The implantation of the valve went well.The surgeon placed 3 sutures in the ncc and 1 each in other 2 cusps (5 total) and patient was doing well post op.The valve was explanted 2 days after detection of the pvl and replaced with a 29mm valve.Patient outcome post redo was favorable.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10.Additional manufacturer narrative: updated section b5.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and shows that this device met all manufacturing specifications for product release prior to distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Corrected data: f10, h6.Reference capa-20-00141.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|