• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEROYAL INDUSTRIES, INC. SUCTION CANISTER; BOTTLE, COLLECTION, VACUUM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEROYAL INDUSTRIES, INC. SUCTION CANISTER; BOTTLE, COLLECTION, VACUUM Back to Search Results
Model Number 71-1105
Device Problems Suction Problem (2170); Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 04/01/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Root cause: a deroyal suction canister was not in use at the time of the event.Another manufacturer's canister was in use.Corrective action: a corrective action has not been taken.Investigation summary: a medwatch report ((b)(4)) was received indicating that a deroyal suction canister (finished good 71-1105) was not providing adequate suction during a procedure.This issue was entered as an internal complaint (call (b)(4)) and investigated.To complete the investigation, deroyal's investigator looked up the reporting customer's shipment history to obtain recently shipped lot numbers to determine if there were any actions that could potentially result in the reported failure.It was discovered that the reporting customer has not purchased (b)(4).The affected part that was reported to the fda as failing.A deroyal sales representative visited the reporting customer june 10, 2019, and contacted (b)(6), the user facility's risk manager who initially reported the incident to the fda.Ms.(b)(6) informed the deroyal representative that another device manufacturer had performed in-servicing for the reported issue, thus confirming that the defective device was not in fact a deroyal suction canister.The investigation is complete at this time.If new or critical information is received, this report will be updated.
 
Event Description
During a bedside bronchoscopy, an issue with the suctioning device arose.There was not adequate suction through the scope.Wall mount was changed, scope was switched out, multiple canisters were also changed.After confirming that the wall suction was adequate and the scope in working order, dr.Noted that the suction after the canister was not strong enough.There seems to be an inadequate seal on the current canisters to allow the suction to work appropriately.Anesthesia was in the room and he stated that this has occurred multiple times in the or as well.Though the patient was not injured in any way, this could have posed a serious threat if the procedure was more in depth.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SUCTION CANISTER
Type of Device
BOTTLE, COLLECTION, VACUUM
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEROYAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
300 debusk lane
powell TN 37849
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEROYAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
300 debusk lane
powell TN 37849
Manufacturer Contact
sarah bennett
200 debusk lane
powell, TN 37849
8653626112
MDR Report Key8739173
MDR Text Key214134641
Report Number1057404-2019-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KDQ
UDI-Device Identifier00749756049146
UDI-Public00749756049146
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type user facility
Reporter Occupation Risk Manager
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/27/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/27/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number71-1105
Device Lot NumberNOT PROVIDED
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/07/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age78 YR
-
-