Reported device not marketed in the u.S., however, similar devices or devices that share components, (b)(4) materials, process methods or other technological characteristics are registered within the u.S.K970541.Investigation: vigilance investigator carried out the pictorial documentation microscopically.The analysis of the fracture pattern illustrated a forced fracture due to overload.No pores, inclusions or foreign bodies could be found on the point of rupture.Beside the fracture pattern as well as at the proximal end, corrections and residues can be found.An abrasion on the circumference of the material of the tip could be recognized.Batch history review: a review of the device quality and manufacturing history records was not possible because the lot number is unknown.Conclusion and root cause: based on the information available as well as a result of our investigation the root cause of the failure is most probably related to an insufficient usage.Rationale: due to the age and the signs of wear and tear, the error was most likely caused by a combination of wear and tear and a final overload situation.We assume the wear and tear was the cause of the abrasion since the device was manufactured in 2015.No capa necessary.
|
It was reported the tip broke off intraoperatively.The reporter indicated that the tip of the instrument broke off during surgery.It is unknown if the broken off part fell in the abdominal cavity.No additional x-ray was performed.It is unknown if the broken off part was left in situ.Per the reporter, it can be possible that the broken part fell on the floor of the operating room.It can also be possible that the broken part fell in the body cavity.It is unknown.Per the reporter, the responsible person found it was such a little fragment that it was almost impossible to find it back.Another instrument was used to continue the surgery.There was no delay in surgery.The current status of the patient is healthy.A request for additional information has been made, however, not yet received.
|