• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC UNK_NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC UNK_NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Transient Ischemic Attack (2109)
Event Date 05/29/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
No device was received for analysis at the time of submission of the initial 3500a.Since the product was not returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors could be made.Device history record (dhr) review cannot be conducted because the lot number was provided by the customer.Manufacturer's ref.No: (b)(4).Biosense webster manufacturer's report numbers: 2029046-2019-03402 are related to the same incident.
 
Event Description
This complaint is from a literature source.The following complications were reported in this publication: 1 patient underwent catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and suffered transient ischemic attack without sequelae.No additional details were provided.Multiple requests for clarification have been sent to the corresponding author, but no additional details were provided at this time.If additional details will be provided this report will be updated accordingly.There are 0 death events and 0 device malfunctions reported in this publication.Model and catalog number are not available, but the suspected device is navistar thermocool.Other biosense webster devices that were also used in this study: none.Non-biosense webster devices that were also used in this study: none.Publication details: title: comparison of two modes of long-term ecg monitoring to assess the efficacy of catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.Objective: the purpose of this prospective study was to compare the utility of daily ecg monitoring with episodic card recorder (ecr) vs.Periodic monitoring with episodic loop recorder (elr) for the detection of post-blanking af/at recurrences during early (months 4-6) and late (months 7-12) periods after catheter ablation for paroxysmal af.Methods: the study included 105 consecutive patients, who received ecr for 12 months and were instructed to send at least 2 random ecg recordings daily with extra-recordings during symptoms.The patients were simultaneously monitored for one week with elr at the end of each period (months 6 and 12).Accepted: may 29, 2018.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK_NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL
Type of Device
UNK
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC
33 technology drive
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte
1820parque industrial salvacar
juarez 32599
MX   32599
Manufacturer Contact
gabriel alfageme
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
949789-868
MDR Report Key8776401
MDR Text Key150575981
Report Number2029046-2019-03403
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LPB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeEZ
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/18/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/18/2019
Initial Date FDA Received07/10/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age58 YR
-
-