• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARJO (SUZHOU) CO., LTD. AUTO LOGIC; MATTRESS, AIR FLOTATION, ALTERNATING PRESSURE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARJO (SUZHOU) CO., LTD. AUTO LOGIC; MATTRESS, AIR FLOTATION, ALTERNATING PRESSURE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Fall (1848); No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 06/07/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation has been carried out onto this incident and conclusions are following.Arjo was informed about a patient fall from arjo auto logic mattress and an unknown bed frame.According to the customer, during the event bed's safety side rails were not in raised position.Specific patient medical condition was not provided apart that they are a paraplegic patient (b)(6).There was no injury reported as an outcome.Customer reported to arjo that they provided recommendations about raising the safety side barriers to their staff, however, they did not follow them at the time of the event.The customer facility reported no allegation of arjo product malfunction.The auto logic product user guide instruction for use (ifu) number 630933en_07 4/2018 warns about the responsibility the caregiver has in order to ensure that the user can use this product safely, additionally: "whilst the patient is unattended, the decision to use safety sides should be based on clinical assessment and in line with local policy".Although the circumstances of this incident are unknown, it seems that its most likely cause is the fact that the customer staff did not follow their own recommendations; safety side barriers were not placed in the high position.The safety side barriers placement could have prevented the patient fall.When reviewing post market surveillance concerning patient fall, we have found 11 incidents (including one investigated here) reported by the same customer: (b)(6).In conclusion, the arjo auto logic system (both mattress and pump) was used while the event occurred, therefore it played role in the event.There was no allegation of device malfunction.Since the information provided is limited, it was not possible to determine the exact root cause of patient fall.We report this event due to allegation of patient fall, which may lead to serious health consequences.
 
Event Description
Arjo was informed about a patient fall from arjo auto logic mattress and unknown bed frame (brand name was not provided).The following information has been gathered from the customer: patient was not hurt as a consequence of this event.The barriers/safety sides were not raised when the event occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AUTO LOGIC
Type of Device
MATTRESS, AIR FLOTATION, ALTERNATING PRESSURE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARJO (SUZHOU) CO., LTD.
no. 158 fangzhou road, sip
suzhou, 21502 4
CH  215024
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARJO (SUZHOU) CO., LTD.
no. 158 fangzhou road, sip
suzhou, 21502 4
CH   215024
Manufacturer Contact
kinga stolinska
ks. wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki, 62-05-2
PL   62-052
MDR Report Key8783930
MDR Text Key191915152
Report Number3005619970-2019-00013
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FNM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,user f
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/12/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/12/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/19/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age48 YR
-
-