Occupation: reporter is company representative.The device was received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H10 additional narrative: h3, h4, h6: a review of the device history record device history lot.Part # 311.43.Synthes lot # 9818103.Supplier lot # na.Release to warehouse date: 02 jun 2015.Manufactured by synthes jennersville.No ncr's were generated during production.Device history batch null, device history review review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any sub-components, which would contribute to this complaint condition.H3, h6: investigation summary background: it was reported that on an unknown date, during routine incoming inspection of loaner set it was observed that the handle with quick coupling was broken.There was no patient involvement.This complaint involves one (1) device.Investigation flow: damage visual inspection: upon visual inspection of the complaint device at us customer quality (cq), a crack on one side of the plastic handle originating at the metallic dowel pin which propagates distally to the distal end of the handle was observed.No other damage was observed.This complaint is confirmed.Dimensional inspection: a dimensional inspection was not performed during this investigation as the root cause of the complaint condition has been identified as a device design deficiency, which has subsequently lead to: "relevant actions being taken to address the issue." document/ specification review: investigation conclusion: a visual inspection and document/specification review were performed as part of this investigation.The complaint condition was confirmed, as the device's handle was observed to be cracked upon visual inspection.A valid design defect was identified as the root cause of the complaint condition.No manufacturing issues were identified through the investigation.A corrective and/or preventative action has already been launched and completed to address the design deficiency.See related action.Based upon these findings, no additional corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.No design issues or discrepancies were found during this investigation.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|