This report is for an unknown resorbable plates/unknown lot.Part and lot number are unknown.Without the specific part number; the udi number and 510-k number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).
|
This report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: pan, hui et al (2019), bioresorbable material in secondary orbital reconstruction surgery, journal of opthalmology, volume 2019, article id 8715314, pages 1-7 (china).The aim of this retrospective study is to validate the potential of bioresorbable implantation in secondary revisional reconstruction after inadequate primary orbital fracture repair, with the assessment of pre- and postoperative clinical characteristics and computed tomography image findings.Between july 2010 to june 2017, a total of 16 patients (9 males and 7 females) were included in the study.All patients were reconstructed using a square plate of 85:15 poly(l-lactide-co-glycolide) (rapidsorb, synthes, oberdorf, switzerland) by a transconjunctival approach after unsatisfactory primary repair.Mean age at the time of secondary surgery was 37 years, with a range of 14 to 67 years.Mean follow-up was 18.4 ± 5.9 months.The following complications were reported as follows: 1 patient had persistent diplopia on the down gaze as before.This report is for an unknown synthes resorbable plates.This is report 1 of 2 for (b)(4).
|