The lot number for the malfunction was provided and a lot history review was performed.The device has been returned for evaluation; the evaluation identified perforation of the tip and partial deployment; however, the evaluation did no identify failure to expand.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.The device is labeled for single use.
|
This report summarizes one malfunction.A review of the reported information indicated that model fvl14080 vascular stent graft allegedly experienced material perforation, partial deployment, and failure to expand.This information was received from a single source.The malfunction involved a patient with no consequence.The patient was reported as a (b)(6)-year-old male weighing (b)(6) kgs.
|
H10: the lot number for the malfunction was provided and a lot history review was performed.The device has been returned to bd for evaluation.The evaluation confirmed for perforation of the tip, partial deployment, for material deformation, and failure to expand.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.The device is labeled for single use.H10: b5; g4, h6 (2976-material deformation).H11: d1; h6 (results, conclusion).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
This report summarizes one malfunction.A review of the reported information indicated that model fvl14080 vascular stent graft allegedly experienced material perforation, partial deployment, material deformation, and failure to expand.This information was received from a single source.The malfunction involved a patient with no consequence.The patient was reported as a 78-year-old male weighing 90 kgs.
|