• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; STENT, CAROTID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; STENT, CAROTID Back to Search Results
Catalog Number SECX-8-6-40-135
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problems Neck Pain (2433); Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688)
Event Date 07/17/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the physician intended to use a protege rx stent to treat a moderately calcified, moderately tortuous, 90% stenotic lesion in the common carotid artery.There was no damage noted to the packaging and no issues noted when removing the device from the tray.The device was prepped per ifu without issue.A 6fr, 100 cm non-medtronic guide catheter and a 5.00 mm spiderfx device were used for the procedure.The device did not pass through a previously deployed stent, no resistance was encountered during advancement, and no excessive force was applied during delivery of the device to the lesion.The stent fully deployed without any issues.Resistance was felt when trying to remove the delivery system, the physician noted that the delivery system still felt connected to the stent.Physician then gently pulled the delivery system but it also pulled the distal end of the stent.The physician then pushed the guide catheter slightly forward to help with retrieving the delivery system and was eventually able to remove the delivery system.During this time, the patient was complaining of neck pain but this was relieved once the delivery catheter was removed.Post dilation was then carried out using a non-medtronic balloon but it was reported that the pinched area of stent recoiled back and minimal improvement was noted.No urological deficit or injury was reported post procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Image review the customer provided 5 cine images from the procedure.The first two cine images show the vessel likely prior to deployment.No visual of the stent was identified within the first two cine images.Image 3-4 show the stent deployed within the vessel.The tantalum markers on each end of the stent were identified.It was observed the stent showed a concave shape at the area of the taper.A fracture of the stent could not be positively identified.The last photo provided likely showed the distal tip of introducer.The photo of the suspected introducer did not show a stent deployed in the vessel.It is unknown at which phase of the procedure this may have been taken.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: the stent remained in position in the intended target lesion.No further treatment reported.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
STENT, CAROTID
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer Contact
toni o'doherty
parkmore business park west
galway 
091708734
MDR Report Key8807240
MDR Text Key151586816
Report Number2183870-2019-00376
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
UDI-Device Identifier00821684038703
UDI-Public00821684038703
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P060001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/16/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/19/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/07/2021
Device Catalogue NumberSECX-8-6-40-135
Device Lot NumberA780028
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/15/2019
Date Device Manufactured02/08/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age51 YR
Patient Weight113
-
-