Further assessment information was received from the reporter on 8aug19.It was stated that the "crack became evident when trying to fit the tip into the cautery handle" and that the device was "pulled out of circulation, new tip used for remainder of case".Therefore, it is thought that the device was not used on a patient.(15) 711b were received in opened unoriginal packaging, the reported catalog number was verified, the lot number was not reported nor was any lot number available with the returned samples.Visual inspection found that all 15 samples did not have the molded polysulfone.Visual inspection was unable to find any cracks anywhere along the needle.Visual inspection found remnants of the polysulfone indicating that it had been present previously.Due to the lack of polysulfone, the molded area was unable to be inspected for cracks.The manufacturing document of the device history record could not be reviewed since the lot number of the devices is unknown.(b)(4).Per the instructions for use, the user is advised the following: contraindications: these devices should never be used when: there is visible evidence of damage to the exterior of the device, such as cracks, cuts, punctures, nicks, abrasions, discoloration or connector damage.Inspection: these devices should be inspected before use and discarded if damage is found.Visually examine the devices for obvious physical damage: cracked, broken or otherwise distorted plastic parts damage including cuts, punctures, nicks, abrasions, unusual lumps or significant discoloration.This issue will continue to be monitored through the complaint system to assure patient safety.
|