Catalog Number NUS-106 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage (1772)
|
Event Date 01/09/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Stryker cmf recently acquired hyperbranch, and this mdr is a result of the remediation process.Hyperbranch had identified this complaint (number: (b)(4)) as non- reportable.Upon further development of the risk files, stryker has decided to file a report.The observation stated in the reported event could not be confirmed, because the information provided was not sufficient.On several different occasions additional information was requested, however the complainant did not respond.The only material received from the complainant was the hyperbranch medical device complaint form.A dhr review was performed for all potentially affected lots.As the device was manufactured by stryker durham (usa), the available complaint information was forwarded to the manufacturing site to review the related quality and manufacturing documents.Within the review no deviations were found, the required tests were performed and did pass without any discrepancies.Based on the limited information provided and the lack of provided follow-up the root cause of this complaint cannot be determined.Considering the investigation including a statistical analysis and the dhr review of the related quality and manufacturing documents there is no indication that the product is not working as intended or any systematic design, material or manufacturing related issue exists.The complaint is added to the complaint trend.Device unable to be returned for evaluation.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient had a csf leak 4 days post-surgery.A revision surgery was performed, and it was noted that no suture was loose.The adherus was replaced with fibrin glue.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient had a csf leak 4 days post-surgery.A revision surgery was performed, and it was noted that no suture was loose.The adherus was replaced with fibrin glue.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The observation stated in the reported event could not be confirmed, because the information provided was not sufficient.On several different occasions additional information was requested, however the complainant did not respond.The only material received from the complainant was the hyperbranch medical device complaint form.A dhr review was performed for all potentially affected lots.As the device was manufactured by stryker durham (usa), the available complaint information was forwarded to the manufacturing site to review the related quality and manufacturing documents.Within the review no deviations were found, the required tests were performed and did pass without any discrepancies.Based on the limited information provided and the lack of provided follow-up the root cause of this complaint cannot be determined.Considering the investigation including a statistical analysis and the dhr review of the related quality and manufacturing documents there is no indication that the product is not working as intended or any systematic design, material or manufacturing related issue exists.The complaint is added to the complaint trend.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|