Medtronic received information via literature regarding a case series describing a technique for elective direct surgical access val ve-in-valve implantation in high-risk patients with severely degenerated aortic or mitral bioprosthetic valves.Case 1: a (b)(6)-year-old female patient who previously underwent surgical aortic valve replacement with a 21 mm non-medtronic bioprosthetic valve presented with bioprosthetic aortic stenosis.Subsequently, the patient underwent aortic valve-in-valve implantation with a 23 mm medtronic evolut r transcatheter valve (serial number not provided).A transesophageal echocardiogram (tee) showed ¿excellent valvular function without leak.¿ at 10 days post implant, it was reported that the patient had a prolonged sinoatrial pause and a permanent pacemaker was implanted.Case 2: an (b)(6)-year-old female patient who previously underwent surgical mitral valve replacement with a 27 mm medtronic hancock ii bioprosthetic valve (serial number not provided) presented with severe mitral regurgitation/insufficiency.Tee exhibited a small left ventricular outflow tract (lvot) and large bioprosthetic struts.Consequently, a direct surgical valve-in-valve implantation technique was performed to avoid potential lvot obstruction.During the procedure, a left atriotomy revealed that the hancock valve had tears in 2 of the 3 leaflets.All 3 leaflets were removed, and a 26 mm non-medtronic transcatheter valve was implanted valve-in-valve.No additional adverse patient effects or product performance issues were reported.
|