• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROVENTION, INC MICROPLEX HELICAL REGULAR; EMBOLIZATION COIL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROVENTION, INC MICROPLEX HELICAL REGULAR; EMBOLIZATION COIL Back to Search Results
Model Number 100730HC-R-V
Device Problems Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 07/11/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The lot number was provided.A search for non-conformances associated with this part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The pusher and implant were returned for analysis.The introducer, dispenser hoop, and microcatheter were not returned.Inspection of the pusher found two sections of lead wire separation.Both sections were at the proximal end and measured 11" and 8" respectively.Aside from the lead wire separation, the pusher was found to be in good condition and without damage.The resistance of the pusher was found to be within specification at 40.7 ohms, indicating no damage to the lead wire/solder joints.The implant was found to still be attached to the pusher.No issues were observed at the markerband/heater coil interface.The implant, however, was broken in two pieces.The filament and filar itself were broken.The implant also contained numerous kinks, bends, and stretched locations.Stretching was noted at the break location.Based on the investigation findings and available information, the reported complaint is confirmed; the implant was found to be broken in two pieces as noted in the complaint.The root cause of the break is unknown.The issue is not related to a manufacturing defect.Though the source of the damage on the implant is unknown, the damage is consistent with an implant that was under forces that exceed its specification.The microcatheter and introducer are considered integral components in the root cause analysis and were not returned.The instructions for use (ifu) identifies premature or difficult coil detachment as potential complications associated with use of the device.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during embolization of an aneurysm of the left middle cerebral artery, an embolization coil encountered friction during advancement in the microcatheter.During removal of the device from the microcatheter, the implant coil stretched and broke.The device was removed in its entirety together with the microcatheter.There was no reported patient injury or intervention.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MICROPLEX HELICAL REGULAR
Type of Device
EMBOLIZATION COIL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROVENTION, INC
35 enterprise drive
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
morgan holody
35 enterprise drive
aliso viejo, CA 92656
MDR Report Key8881259
MDR Text Key188868852
Report Number2032493-2019-00188
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00810170010200
UDI-Public(01)00810170010200(11)180725(17)230630(10)1807255V3
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K050954
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/11/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/09/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Expiration Date06/30/2023
Device Model Number100730HC-R-V
Device Catalogue Number100730HC-R-V
Device Lot Number1807255V3
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/29/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/11/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/30/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age25 YR
-
-