• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; STENT, CAROTID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; STENT, CAROTID Back to Search Results
Catalog Number SEPX-10-7-40-135
Device Problem Activation Failure (3270)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/22/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation visual inspection: the protégé rx was received with the outer sheath pull back exposing the distal end of the stent.Approximately 1.5cm of the stent was exposed and flowered (pre-deployed).The dark blue outer sheath is twisted and buckled at the distal tip of the printed strain relief.The printed stain relief was removed, it was observed the dark blue outer sheath had separated from its bond to the manifold exposing the ss hypotube.The dark blue outer sheath also exhibits necking down and torsional twist onto the push wire.The light blue outer sheath shows evidence of twisting and buckling over the distal inner assembly.The tuohy-borst valve was tightened.Functional testing: due to the extent of the damage to the device, the stent could not be deployed out of the catheter.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The physician was attempting to use a protégé rx device to treat a 28mm moderately calcified lesion with 80% stenosis in the left proximal common carotid artery.There was little tortuosity reported, artery diameter 6mm.An 8fr cook sheath, 0.014 abbott guidewire and a 6mm spiderfx embolic protection was used in the procedure.There was no damage to the device packaging and no issues when removing the device from its packaging.The device was prepped per ifu with no issues.The device did not pass through a previously deployed stent.No resistance was encountered and excessive force was not used.It was reported that the stent could not be deployed upon repeated attempts.After the stent reached the lesion site, the stent was positioned and the y valve was released.When the stent was ready to be released, it was found that the stent could not be released.After many efforts, the stent failed.The patient returned to the ward safely.No symptoms or complications with this event and no patient injury reported.When the stent was returned t o the manufacturing facility, it was noted that the stent was pre-deployed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
STENT, CAROTID
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer Contact
toni o'doherty
parkmore business park west
galway 
091708734
MDR Report Key8887155
MDR Text Key163158756
Report Number2183870-2019-00401
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
P060001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/13/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/13/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/13/2020
Device Catalogue NumberSEPX-10-7-40-135
Device Lot NumberA612783
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/17/2019
Date Manufacturer Received08/09/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/14/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age82 YR
-
-