CONCORD MANUFACTURING LIBERTY SELECT CYCLER ASSY(NON-VALUATED); SYSTEM, PERITONEAL, AUTOMATIC DELIVERY
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number RTLR180343 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
No Information (3190)
|
Event Date 08/01/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Clinical investigation: it is unknown if a temporal relationship exists between continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis (ccpd) therapy utilizing the liberty select cycler and the patient¿s hospitalization, as it is unknown when the patient last underwent ccpd therapy.There is no allegation or objective evidence indicating a liberty select cycler deficiency or malfunction caused or contributed to the event(s).However, based on limited information available and the lack of specific details, the liberty select cycler cannot be excluded from having a possible causal or contributory role in the patient¿s hospitalization.The plant investigation is in process.A supplemental mdr will be submitted upon completion of this activity. .
|
|
Event Description
|
During a follow up call, it was reported that the patient had been in the hospital.Upon follow up with the patient¿s outpatient dialysis center, it was discovered that the patient was driving home from vacation, became ill (specifics not provided), and stopped at the closest hospital.The patient stayed approximately 2 days (exact dates not provided) and was discharged (specifics not provided).The discharge summary is currently not available.The patient returned home, but was hospitalized again (date and specifics not provided) and currently remains hospitalized.The admitting diagnosis for either hospitalization was not provided, however the outpatient dialysis center reported that the hospitalizations were for the same reason.The discharge summary and additional patient information was requested; however, the request was declined.The current disposition of the patient is unknown, and subsequent attempts to gather additional information have thus far proven unsuccessful.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Plant investigation: no parts were returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.A records review was performed on the reported serial number.An investigation of the device manufacturing records was conducted by the manufacturer.There were no non-conformances, or any associated rework identified during the manufacturing process which could be related to the reported event.In addition, the device history record (dhr) review confirmed the results of the in-progress and final quality control (qc) testing met all requirements.The investigation into the cause of the reported problem was not able to be confirmed.A definitive conclusion regarding the complaint incident cannot be reached without a physical examination of the complaint device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|