It was reported that right hip revision surgery was performed due to progressive pain, difficulty walking, elevated cobalt levels from failed right hip resurfacing arthroplasty consistent with metal-on-metal wear.Surgical findings confirmed that the failed birmingham right hip resurfacing arthroplasty resulted from metal-on-metal wear and a resulting adverse metal reaction to metal wear debris.
|
It was reported that right hip revision surgery was performed.During the revision, the bhr cup was removed.The bhr head remained implanted.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment, and additional information have been requested for this complaint but have not become available.A review of the complaint history for the bhr cup and bhr head was performed using batch numbers in search of similar recurring reports for the products during their lifetimes.No other similar complaints were identified.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All the released devices involved met manufacturing specifications at the time of production.Review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event and no further actions are required at this time.The available medical documents were reviewed.The reported adverse reaction to metal wear debris and the intraoperative findings of migration and the acetabular component into anteversion and high inclination as well as bone loss may be consistent with findings associated with metal debris.The changes in position of the acetabular component could accelerate wear and lead to metal debris and result in metallosis as well.It cannot be concluded that the reported clinical reactions were associated with a mal-performance of the implant versus variation of the initial implant orientation as it is unknown if the revision findings of acetabular implant position was due to migration or present since implantation.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
|