The initial failure description was a "head error".The complaint was closed on 2020-01-10 due to lack of information.Reopend on (b)(4) because of receiving the emtec investigation results.The effected rotaflow drive with the serial number (b)(6) was shipped to germany under rma#39221 for repair to the manufacturer emtec.Incoming goods in rastatt on 2019-10-07.--> functional test in rastatt on 2019-10-08 head error confirmed.Send to emtec on 2019-10-14.Back from emtec on 2020-02-13.Functional test in rastatt after emtec on 2020-02-13.Outgoing goods on 2020-02-13.According to the service report rma2019-10247 from emtec the failure could be confirmed.The electronic platine mc1 and mc2 was detected as defective.Additional work was performed: knurled nut, pressure piece, electronic parts, flowsensor and sealing replaced.All defective parts were replaced.The rotaflow drive passed all tests.This work was performed on 2020-01-29.Thus the reported failure could be confirmed and a most probable root cause could be determined as aging according to emtec.The rotaflow drive was tested in rastatt according to current valid service protocol.Furthermore most probable root causes for the reported failure "head error" are determined as follows: 1.The head error is caused by the hot plug.When device is in operation and the power plug is plugged in or out.And this leads to a damage at the control board of the rotaflow.2.The head error follows by the sig error.This is when the ultrasonic crème is applied to the flow bubble sensor.Then the centrifugal pump is causing backflow and this leads to the head error.3.The head error is also caused by shaking the drive.This is when the motor (which is controlled by the optical tacho) is not blocked when adjusting to 0 then it could lead to error when slight shaking.The motor could then slightly rotate.4.The head error can be caused by connection issues between the console (rfc) and the drive (rfd).This is when the cable connection is disturbed by defective pins.Furthermore, the instructions for use of the rotaflow system, see rotaflow system user manuel, mcv-ga-10000703-de-11 contain detailed descriptions to prevent an ¿error head¿.Due to missing information despite several requests it is unknown if the device was used for treatment and diagnosis.The device was directly involved thus a relationship between the complaint and the device is given.The occurrence rate is below the acceptance rate, thus no remedial action required.The ocurrance rate related to the reported issue is currently being monitored as part of maquet cardiopumonary¿s trending program and additional investigations or corrections will be implemented in case of adverse trending.
|