• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT VASCULAR SUPERA SELF-EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM; SELF EXPANDING PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT VASCULAR SUPERA SELF-EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM; SELF EXPANDING PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number S-45-080-120-P6
Device Problems Material Separation (1562); Activation Failure (3270)
Patient Problem Ischemia (1942)
Event Date 08/06/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Exemption number (b)(4).The customer reported the device was retained by the hospital and will not be returned.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat a mildly calcified proximal popliteal artery.It was a percutaneous intervention procedure without atherectomy.The 4.5x80mm supera peripheral stent delivery system was advanced without any resistance noted.During deployment, it was believed that the stent was fully released but when the catheter was pulled back, the stent came back with it.It was confirmed via fluoroscopy that the stent was no longer in place and it was moved to the common femoral artery.Outside of the patient it was noted that the tip was separated.A groin cut down was done to retrieve the stent and separated tip.Post the groin cut down, the patient had a limited flow in the anterior tibial artery.The physician was not sure if the limited flow was due to the time of getting the stent and tip out or if plaque had caused it.The physician then opted for a full femoral popliteal bypass to treat the unstented proximal popliteal.The flow from the bypass restored the flow in the anterior tibial artery.There was no adverse patient sequela reported.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Exemption number e2019001-permits numbering sequence to begin with 10000, to avoid duplication of report numbers due to process transition.There may be gaps in numbering for reports submitted during the transition period.The device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents.The reported patient effect of ischemia is listed in the supera instruction for use as a known potential adverse effect associated with peripheral percutaneous intervention.Based on the information provided, a conclusive cause for the reported difficulties could not be determined.The additional event of ischemia is related to case circumstances.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.Attachment: user facility medwatch report # (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat a mildly calcified proximal popliteal artery.It was a percutaneous intervention procedure without atherectomy.The 4.5x80mm supera peripheral stent delivery system was advanced without any resistance noted.During deployment, it was believed that the stent was fully released but when the catheter was pulled back, the stent came back with it.It was confirmed via fluoroscopy that the stent was no longer in place and it was moved to the common femoral artery.Outside of the patient it was noted that the tip was separated.A groin cut down was done to retrieve the stent and separated tip.Post the groin cut down, the patient had a limited flow in the anterior tibial artery.The physician was not sure if the limited flow was due to the time of getting the stent and tip out or if plaque had caused it.The physician then opted for a full femoral popliteal bypass to treat the unstented proximal popliteal.The flow from the bypass restored the flow in the anterior tibial artery.There was no adverse patient sequela reported.No additional information was provided.Subsequent to filing the initial medwatch report, a user facility medwatch report was received: medwatch case details: [physician was implanting a supera stent percutaneously when they felt it release and the cone tip was released into the previous stent and he was unable to dislodge it during angiograms.Physician decided to do a right femoral cutdown and exploration with removal of the stent.All pieces of the stent were removed.].
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being resubmitted to ensure the enclosed attachment can be easily opened by the fda.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SUPERA SELF-EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
SELF EXPANDING PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT VASCULAR
26531 ynez rd.
temecula CA 92591 4628
MDR Report Key8941383
MDR Text Key155993821
Report Number2024168-2019-11282
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIP
UDI-Device Identifier08717648225963
UDI-Public08717648225963
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P120020
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/20/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2020
Device Model NumberS-45-080-120-P6
Device Catalogue NumberS-45-080-120-P6
Device Lot Number8081661
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/06/2019
Initial Date FDA Received08/28/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/22/2019
07/20/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/11/2019
07/20/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
6F COOK FLEXOR 30CM
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention; Disability;
Patient Age56 YR
-
-