(b)(4).Investigation summary: the device was returned with the distal tip of the blade broken off and it was returned with the device.The remaining blade portion was scratched, and with evidence of contact with metal in or out of the operative field.The device was connected to a test hand piece and a gen11.The device was analyzed, and it was determined that it was possibly used in more than one procedure, based on generator data.The device is intended and labeled for single patient use.If the device is connected to multiple generators, an alert screen will be displayed indicating ¿adaptive tissue technology features are not available in this device¿.No unexpected ready to pre run issues were identified as reported by the customer.The device was disassembled to inspect the internal components.Corrosion was found at the hand activation domes.Due to the moisture discovered on the instrument, which is evidence of possible reuse, we are unable to determine how this condition impacted the performance of the device and, therefore, cannot conclude root cause.Our manufacturing, sterilization, packaging, and shipment processes do not introduce corrosion / moisture to the device.Probable causes of blade damage, including breakage, are external contact during pre-op or general use, blade contact with other devices, staples or clips during the procedure or using any means other than the blade wrench to attach or detach the blade.Once minor blade damage has occurred, subsequent activations may increase the severity of the blade damage.This in turn can result in failing the pre-run test with the generator and displaying an alert screen.These alert screens that can result are such as ¿tighten assembly¿, ¿blade error detected¿ or "relaxed pressure on blade" followed by a ¿replace instrument¿ screen later in the procedure.Continued usage of the damage blade can result in a broken blade.Due to the multiple generator usage, which is evidence of possible reuse, we are unable to determine how this condition impacted the performance of the device and, therefore, cannot conclude root cause.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number, and no non-conformance's were identified.
|