Model Number 8300AB |
Device Problem
Perivalvular Leak (1457)
|
Patient Problem
No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 08/12/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was not returned to edwards for evaluation.The device history record (dhr) was unable to be reviewed as the device serial number was not provided.Regurgitation is considered to be a perivalvular leak (pvl) if a turbulent eccentric jet originates between the bioprosthetic sewing ring and the annulus.While the majority of affected patients are asymptomatic, it can lead to significant morbidity including heart failure and hemolytic anemia.Pvl can occur in the mitral and aortic position for similar reasons, including technique and patient related factors.The type and cause of regurgitation varies depending upon multiple factors.Typically, mild regurgitation is not unusual after initial valve replacement, and is usually tolerated by patients.Often moderate to high regurgitation requiring re-operation in the immediate post-operation period is due to procedural related issues and is unrelated to the device.A definitive root cause could not be determined.Edwards lifesciences will continue to monitor all reported events.No further actions are required at this time.
|
|
Event Description
|
Edwards received notification that a valve of unknown size was explanted approximately 6 hours after the implant due to paravalvular leak (pvl).No other information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluation: customer report of pvl could not be confirmed through visual observations.X-ray demonstrated wireform intact and frame expanded.Leaflet 1 had a non-transmural leaflet tear approximately 5mm long near commissure 2 on the outflow aspect.Fibrin on the stent circumference was minimal on the outflow aspect.No other visible inconsistencies were observed on the valve.A suture hole was visible near one of the three black stitch markings on the sewing ring.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluation: customer report of pvl could not be confirmed through visual observations.X-ray demonstrated wireform intact and frame expanded.Leaflet 1 had a non-transmural leaflet damage approximately 5mm long near commissure 2 on the outflow aspect.Host tissue on the stent circumference was minimal on the outflow aspect.No other visible inconsistencies were observed on the valve.A suture hole was visible near one of the three black stitch markings on the sewing ring.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and shows that this device met all manufacturing specifications for product release prior to distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Corrected data: f10, h6.Reference capa-20-00141.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|